JUNIPER JN0-664 LATEST EXAM COST, TOP JN0-664 EXAM DUMPS

Juniper JN0-664 Latest Exam Cost, Top JN0-664 Exam Dumps

Juniper JN0-664 Latest Exam Cost, Top JN0-664 Exam Dumps

Blog Article

Tags: JN0-664 Latest Exam Cost, Top JN0-664 Exam Dumps, JN0-664 Reliable Exam Test, Valid Dumps JN0-664 Pdf, JN0-664 Reliable Exam Braindumps

Life is full of ups and downs. We cannot predicate what will happen in the future. To avoid being washed out by the artificial intelligence, we must keep absorbing various new knowledge. Our JN0-664 learning questions will inspire your motivation to improve yourself. Tens of thousands of our loyal customers are benefited from our JN0-664 Study Materials and lead a better life now after they achieve their JN0-664 certification.

The JN0-664 exam covers a wide range of topics, including Junos OS fundamentals, routing protocols, network security, MPLS, QoS, and more. Candidates must have a deep understanding of these topics and practical experience in configuring and troubleshooting Juniper Networks service provider networks. Passing JN0-664 Exam demonstrates that a candidate has the necessary skills and knowledge to design, implement, and troubleshoot complex service provider networks using Juniper Networks technology.

>> Juniper JN0-664 Latest Exam Cost <<

JN0-664 Latest Exam Cost - 100% Pass-Sure Questions Pool

It is important to cover Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) (JN0-664) exam topics and check if you need to practice them. If you are talking about the Juniper JN0-664 certification exam, you need to practice and overcome mistakes. If you do not practice for it, chances are that you might get confused while appearing for the JN0-664 Exam. When you get the test study material, it comes with the Juniper JN0-664 practice exams (desktop & web-based) to solve.

The JN0-664 exam covers a wide range of topics related to service provider routing and switching, including advanced routing protocols, MPLS, Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs, BGP, multicast, and high availability. JN0-664 exam consists of 65 multiple-choice questions and has a time limit of 120 minutes. Candidates must achieve a passing score of 65% or higher to earn their certification. The JNCIP-SP certification is valid for three years, after which candidates must recertify by passing an exam or completing a specified number of continuing education credits. Earning this certification demonstrates a high level of expertise in service provider routing and switching and can open up new career opportunities in the networking industry.

Juniper JN0-664 (Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP)) Exam is an excellent certification for network professionals who want to demonstrate their advanced knowledge and skills in service provider routing and switching technologies. It is a challenging exam that requires a solid understanding of Juniper Networks technology, but passing it can open up new career opportunities and enhance your professional credibility.

Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) Sample Questions (Q89-Q94):

NEW QUESTION # 89
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, you are receiving the 192.168 0 0/16 route on both R3 and R4 from your EBGP neighbor You must ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes from the route reflector In this scenario, which BGP feature should you configure to accomplish this behavior?

  • A. multihop
  • B. add-path
  • C. multipath
  • D. route-target

Answer: B

Explanation:
BGP add-path is a feature that allows the advertisement of multiple paths through the same peering session for the same prefix without the new paths implicitly replacing any previous paths. This behavior promotes path diversity and reduces multi-exit discriminator (MED) oscillations. BGP add-path is implemented by adding a path identifier to each path in the NLRI. The path identifier can be considered as something similar to a route distinguisher in VPNs, except that a path ID can apply to any address family. Path IDs are unique to a peering session and are generated for each network3. In this question, we have a route reflector (RR) that receives two routes for the same prefix (192.168.0.0/16) from an EBGP neighbor. By default, the RR will only advertise its best path to its clients (R1 and R2). However, we want R1 and R2 to receive both routes from the RR. To achieve this, we need to configure BGP add-path on the RR and enable it to send multiple paths for the same prefix to its clients.


NEW QUESTION # 90
Exhibit

Click the Exhibit button-Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct about BGP routes on R3 that are learned from the ISP-A neighbor? (Choose two.)

  • A. The BGP local-preference value that is used by ISP-A is not advertised to R3.
  • B. All BGP attribute values must be removed before receiving the routes.
  • C. The next-hop value for these routes is changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3.
  • D. By default, the next-hop value for these routes is not changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3.

Answer: A,D

Explanation:
BGP is an exterior gateway protocol that uses path vector routing to exchange routing information among autonomous systems. BGP uses various attributes to select the best path to each destination and to propagate routing policies. Some of the common BGP attributes are AS path, next hop, local preference, MED, origin, weight, and community. BGP attributes can be classified into four categories: well-known mandatory, well-known discretionary, optional transitive, and optional nontransitive. Well-known mandatory attributes are attributes that must be present in every BGP update message and must be recognized by every BGP speaker.
Well-known discretionary attributes are attributes that may or may not be present in a BGP update message but must be recognized by every BGP speaker. Optional transitive attributes are attributes that may or may not be present in a BGP update message and may or may not be recognized by a BGP speaker. If an optional transitive attribute is not recognized by a BGP speaker, it is passed along to the next BGP speaker. Optional nontransitive attributes are attributes that may or may not be present in a BGP update message and may or may not be recognized by a BGP speaker. If an optional nontransitive attribute is not recognized by a BGP speaker, it is not passed along to the next BGP speaker. In this question, we have four routers (R1, R2, R3, and R4) that are connected in a full mesh topology and running IBGP. R3 receives the 192.168.0.0/16 route from its EBGP neighbor and advertises it to R1 and R4 with different BGP attribute values. We are asked which statements are correct about the BGP routes on R3 that are learned from the ISP-A neighbor. Based on the information given, we can infer that the correct statements are:
By default, the next-hop value for these routes is not changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3. This is because the default behavior of EBGP is to preserve the next-hop attribute of the routes received from another EBGP neighbor. The next-hop attribute indicates the IP address of the router that should be used as the next hop to reach the destination network.
The BGP local-preference value that is used by ISP-A is not advertised to R3. This is because the local-preference attribute is a well-known discretionary attribute that is used to influence the outbound traffic from an autonomous system. The local-preference attribute is only propagated within an autonomous system and is not advertised to external neighbors.
References: : https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13753-25.html :
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html :
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13759-37.html


NEW QUESTION # 91
Exhibit

A network is using IS-IS for routing.
In this scenario, why are there two TLVs shown in the exhibit?

  • A. There are both narrow and wide metric devices in the topology
  • B. Both IPv4 and IPv6 are being used in the topology
  • C. The interface specified a metric of 100 for L2.
  • D. Wide metrics have specifically been requested

Answer: A

Explanation:
TLVs are tuples of (Type, Length, Value) that can be advertised in IS-IS packets. TLVs can carry different kinds of information in the Link State Packets (LSPs). IS-IS supports both narrow and wide metrics for link costs. Narrow metrics use a single octet to encode the link cost, while wide metrics use three octets. Narrow metrics have a maximum value of 63, while wide metrics have a maximum value of 16777215. If there are both narrow and wide metric devices in the topology, IS-IS will advertise two TLVs for each link: one with the narrow metric and one with the wide metric. This allows backward compatibility with older devices that only support narrow metrics12.


NEW QUESTION # 92
Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.
What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

  • A. Add the internal interface prefix to the BGP routing tables.
  • B. Add the external interface prefix to the IGP routing tables
  • C. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
  • D. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
Explanation
the default behavior for iBGP is to propagate EBGP-learned prefixes without changing the next-hop. This can cause issues if the next-hop is not reachable via the IGP. One solution is to use the next-hop self command on R4, which will change the next-hop attribute to its own loopback address. This way, R5 can reach the next-hop via the IGP and install the route in its routing table.
Another solution is to add the external interface prefix (120.0.4.16/30) to the IGP routing tables of R4 and R5.
This will also make the next-hop reachable via the IGP and allow R5 to use the route. According to 2, this is a possible workaround for a pure IP network, but it may not work well for an MPLS network.


NEW QUESTION # 93
You have an EVI implemented between PE-1, PE-2, and PE-3 to allow communication between CE-1 and CE-2. CE-2 receives unicast traffic from CE-1 on both links to PE-2 and PE-3. When CE-1 sends broadcast traffic. CE-2 receives it on only one of the multihomed links.
Referring to the exhibit, which EVPN route type enables this behavior?

  • A. Type 4
  • B. Type 1
  • C. Type 2
  • D. Type 3

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 94
......

Top JN0-664 Exam Dumps: https://www.validtorrent.com/JN0-664-valid-exam-torrent.html

Report this page